|
Post by scousette on Oct 13, 2010 11:41:41 GMT -5
Sir Joe Lockwood suggested that Paul pose for the cover because "he's better looking." Maybe Sir Joe didn't pay enough attention to the Hollies and didn't think of Tony. Women are the other half of the income too, so you'd think these record companies would get a clue and sell us some beefcake with our music. Good point on Sir Joe! I am not sure I'd want the 2010 versions of Tony and Paul naked on the album cover as I carefully wanted the 1968 versions of the two men when they were hotties. Gravity adversely effects men too. Unlike Paul, there was real substance behind Tony Hicks. He was sensitive and caring before James Taylor made that a joke for men. Oh, definitely the 1968 versions! The 2010 versions would have to be photoshopped to the max. ;D
|
|
|
Post by joeyself on Jan 25, 2011 10:34:11 GMT -5
I have a secondary question: Should this poll stay as a sticky note now?
JcS
|
|
|
Post by Steve Marinucci on May 4, 2011 11:53:34 GMT -5
I removed this from the announcements, but I can't believe how much activity this topic has gotten. More than some Beatle threads. Wow...
|
|
|
Post by scousette on May 4, 2011 13:37:28 GMT -5
I removed this from the announcements, but I can't believe how much activity this topic has gotten. More than some Beatle threads. Wow... ;D
|
|
|
Post by Steve Marinucci on May 4, 2011 21:26:55 GMT -5
I removed this from the announcements, but I can't believe how much activity this topic has gotten. More than some Beatle threads. Wow... ;D Is that a guilty grin or what?
|
|
|
Post by John S. Damm on May 6, 2011 11:17:32 GMT -5
Tony Hicks is a cool guitarist, competent(and stangely dreamy) singer that induces man-crushes with even the most ardent heterosexual dudes like me! Well, John Oates too.
|
|